Execs and the City

Execs and the City

Executive Networking Without LinkedIn: How to Build a High-Leverage Network Privately

How to build a high-leverage executive network without posting "thought leadership," sending cold spam, or eating bad cheese at networking events.

Jacob Warwick's avatar
Jacob Warwick
Dec 18, 2025
∙ Paid

Most executives operate under the false assumption that there are only three ways to build a high-leverage network.

Option A: You cosplay as a “LinkedIn Influencer,” posting platitudes about leadership at 8:00 AM everyday, hoping the algorithm blesses you with inbound leads.

Option B: You send vapid, “let’s connect” spam messages that are rightfully ignored by anyone with real authority. Seriously, I have over 400 of these right now—why are you wasting your time?

Option C: You go to in-person mixers, wearing a sticky note name badge, practicing your elevator pitch while eating bad cheese and praying no one talks to you.

Let’s call this what it is: Chewing glass.

It is painful, it is inefficient, and worst of all, it signals low status—because let’s be honest—the top senior leaders don’t have to do this.

People chase them.

If you are chasing people, you are—by definition—below them in the power dynamic. The market can smell the desperation of “Just checking in!” email from a mile away.

But there is a fourth way.

It is a silent, surgical approach used by the best sales professionals in the world (credit to Jordan Crawford on this one).

It is called the Permissionless Value Proposition.

Or as I like to call it, giving more than you expect to get in return—without asking whether you should.

Just do it.

Instead of asking for a meeting, you deliver a custom “micro-gift” of insight so specific and valuable that they would pay to receive it.

This is how you build a reputation as the executive who always delivers value, without ever posting a single “thoughts on leadership” thread.

Because, if you’re actually leading in a senior leadership position—ain’t nobody got time for that!

The Biology of the “Cold” Outreach

To understand why traditional networking fails, we have to look at the hardware—your brain.

The human brain is a prediction machine designed to keep you alive. When a stranger approaches you—whether in a dark alley or a LinkedIn DM—your Amygdala (the threat detection center) immediately tags the interaction as a risk.

  • Do I know this person? No.

  • Do they want something from me? Yes.

  • Verdict: Threat (or Nuisance). Delete.

When you send a cold connection request, you are literally triggering a biological defense mechanism in your target.

You are fighting millions of years of evolution that screams, “Stranger = Danger.”

If you’re dialing for dollars—God bless you, but please recognize how you—and 10 to 15 others that look like you everyday—make our lives worse when you call us and follow up with an endless email drip.

You cannot win this fight with a “better subject line.” You have to bypass the Amygdala entirely.

To do that, we are going to leverage two psychological principles:

  1. The Mere Exposure Effect: The more we see a face, the more we trust it (provided the context is neutral or positive).

  2. Pavlovian Conditioning: We are going to train your target’s brain to associate your headshot with a dopamine hit of high-value insight.

We aren’t going to “network.” We are going to engineer familiarity.

Here is the protocol.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Jacob Warwick · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture